NGT Upholds Great Nicobar Island Project Clearance
Why focus: GS3 Environment. Multi-crore EIA clearances routinely generate map-based MCQs on nearby National Parks and vulnerable tribal groups.
In News
What Happened
Why It Matters
Background
History & Context
What Changed
- ▶
Clearance Status: BEFORE, the project's environmental clearance was under intense judicial scrutiny and faced potential suspension. NOW, the NGT has formally validated the 2022 EC, removing major legal hurdles for construction.
- ▶
ICRZ Zoning Interpretation: BEFORE, petitioners argued the transshipment port fell within ICRZ-IA (Island Coastal Regulation Zone-IA), where development is strictly prohibited. NOW, the NGT accepted the NCSCM's finding that no part of the project lies in the restricted ICRZ-IA zone.
- ▶
Coral Reef Management: BEFORE, the project threatened widespread destruction of coral colonies without a clear, localized mitigation strategy. NOW, the NGT mandated the MoEFCC to ensure coral regeneration using scientific methods and approved the ZSI's suggestion for 'coral translocation'.
- ▶
Security versus Environment Precedent: BEFORE, environmental impact assessments were largely viewed on ecological merit. NOW, the NGT has explicitly established that 'strategic importance' and 'economic value' (countering foreign pressure in the Indian Ocean) can justify accepting generalized environmental safeguards.
- ▶
Project Monitoring Framework: BEFORE, oversight was fragmented. NOW, the NGT placed direct compliance responsibility on the Union Environment Ministry to implement an execution plan for shoreline protection and safeguarding nesting beaches.
What Did NOT Change
Despite widespread demands from environmental and tribal rights groups, the High-Powered Committee's report was not placed in the public domain, as the NGT accepted a plea of strategic confidentiality. Furthermore, the massive scale of the project - involving the diversion of 130 sq km of pristine rainforest and the felling of nearly a million trees - remained unaltered.
Prelims Angle
NCERT Connection
Common Misconceptions
✗ The NGT cancelled the Great Nicobar project due to violations of the Island Coastal Regulation Zone (ICRZ) rules.
✓ The NGT upheld the project, accepting expert reports from the NCSCM that claimed the project area does not actually fall under the strictly prohibited ICRZ-IA category.
Initial 2023 NGT observations heavily questioned the coastal impact, leading many to assume the project would eventually be stalled by these stringent coastal rules.
✗ The High-Powered Committee (HPC) report on the project's ecological impact is open for public scrutiny and debate.
✓ The HPC report was kept confidential and not placed in the public domain by the NGT due to the strategic and defense sensitivities of the project.
Usually, environmental impact reports and court-appointed committee findings are public documents meant to ensure transparency and accountability.
Practice Questions
Q1
How Many CorrectConsider the following statements regarding the Great Nicobar Island mega-infrastructure project: 1. It is being implemented by the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation (ANIIDCO). 2. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) relied on findings from the National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM) to determine Island Coastal Regulation Zone (ICRZ) compliance. 3. The project includes an International Container Transshipment Terminal at Galathea Bay, which is exclusively known as a nesting site for Olive Ridley turtles. How many of the above statements are correct?
Q2
Match the FollowingMatch the following entities involved in the Great Nicobar project with their specific role or characteristic: Entity (List I) A. NITI Aayog B. High-Powered Committee (HPC) C. Galathea Bay D. ICRZ-IA Role/Characteristic (List II) 1. Categorized as the most strictly protected coastal ecological zone 2. Evaluated coral reef protection and coastal regulation compliance for the NGT 3. Conceived the 'Holistic Development of Great Nicobar Island' initiative 4. Site for the proposed International Container Transshipment Terminal (ICTT)
Q3
Assertion & ReasonAssertion (A): The National Green Tribunal (NGT) declined to make the High-Powered Committee's report on the Great Nicobar project public. Reason (R): The Environment Protection Act of 1986 mandates that all coastal infrastructure assessments in Union Territories must legally remain classified.