Defence & SecurityImportant2025-04-22

Pahalgam Terror Attack and Strategic Policy Shift

Q: Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the bilateral and regional mechanisms affected by the Pahalgam attack?

1 only — Statement 1 is correct: The Indus Waters Treaty was brokered by the World Bank and signed in 1960. Statement 2 is incorrect: The SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES), launched in 1992, does not allow visa-free travel for 'all' citizens; it is restricted to specific categories of dignitaries such as parliamentarians, judges, and senior officials.

In News

What Happened

On April 22, 2025, the Pakistan-backed terror group 'The Resistance Front' (TRF) orchestrated a deadly attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, claiming the lives of 26 civilians. In response to the massacre, India executed a major policy shift by deploying non-kinetic retaliatory measures, including the suspension of the 1960 Indus Water Treaty and the revocation of the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) for Pakistani nationals. These stringent diplomatic and economic actions laid the groundwork for a broader strategic response termed 'Operation Sindoor'.

Why It Matters

The event represents a watershed moment in India's internal security and foreign policy, signaling a transition from purely military (kinetic) retaliation to total systemic deterrence. By weaponizing diplomatic frameworks and the critical Indus Water Treaty, India demonstrated its willingness to dismantle long-standing bilateral agreements to penalize state-sponsored terrorism.

Background

History & Context

The Indus Water Treaty (IWT) was brokered by the World Bank in 1960 between Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and President Ayub Khan, surviving decades of wars and crises. The SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES), operationalized in 1992, was designed to foster people-to-people contact among South Asian nations by allowing visa-free travel for specified dignitaries. Meanwhile, 'The Resistance Front' (TRF) emerged in late 2019 as a shadow outfit for Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) to circumvent Financial Action Task Force (FATF) sanctions by projecting terrorism in Kashmir as a 'secular, indigenous' resistance.

What Changed

▶
BEFORE: The Indus Water Treaty functioned as an uninterrupted, legally binding water-sharing mechanism between India and Pakistan despite political hostilities. NOW: India suspended the treaty, establishing a new precedent that resource sharing cannot coexist with cross-border terrorism.
▶
BEFORE: Certain categories of Pakistani citizens, such as parliamentarians, senior judges, and journalists, could utilize the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) for streamlined travel to India. NOW: The SVES has been entirely revoked for Pakistani nationals, effectively freezing this avenue of institutional diplomatic and civil exchange.
▶
BEFORE: Retaliation against Pakistan-backed terror was primarily kinetic, exemplified by the 2016 surgical strikes and the 2019 Balakot airstrikes. NOW: India's security calculus integrates severe non-kinetic leverage (water, diplomacy, and FATF-aligned financial warfare) prior to or alongside operations like 'Operation Sindoor'.

Prelims Angle

NCERT Connection

This event bridges with Class 12 Political Science Chapter 8 ('Regional Aspirations'), which discusses the historical evolution of the Kashmir conflict and the complexities of external state interference. The shift in India's approach highlights a modern application of managing regional aspirations and integration by neutralizing the external factors (state-sponsored proxy groups) that exploit internal fault lines.

Practice Questions

Q1

Correct Statement(s)

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the bilateral and regional mechanisms affected by the Pahalgam attack?

Up next